|
Issues discussed on this
page require Action. It is hoped that if you have come to this page
it is assumed that you are involved or want to be more involved.
Now is the time
to Act
We
need 221 Representatives to Co-Sponsor
HR2254
We need 67 Senators to Co-Sponsor
S1939
We need YOUR support today
Contact your Representative and Senator today
| This Petition for HR2254 has been closed. It is still being shown so that those that signed can see how many signitures we raised in support of HR2254 and sent to Congress.
|
|
Support is starting to
progress for Senate Bill S1939 with
14
Co-Sponsors as of February 4, 2010.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, introduced
S1939 the Agent Orange Equity Act of 2009 in the
Senate on 10-27-2009. The bill will, when enacted,
restore presumptive eligibility for exposure to
herbicides to Veterans of the Vietnam War who served in
the Blue Water Navy, the Blue Sky Air Force, and those
who served in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia, all of whom
were included in the original Agent Orange Act of 1991,
but were later removed by the Department of Veterans
Affairs.
Support is growing in
Congress for HR2254 with
244 Co-Sponsors as of February 3, 2010. We need many more
co-sponsors to get the Bill passed and this can only be done with
you contacting all congressman in your state. NOT just the
congressman who represents your district, but ALL the congressman
who represent your state. The more congressman who become aware of
HR2254 the better. And soon all of congress will know about HR2254
and how important it is in restoring Veteran Benefits with the Agent
Orange Equity Act of 2009.
To get a list of your States Senators and
Representatives use the Links Page on the
VASVW Group Site
or on the www.VASVW.org
and find [Where to contact your Congressman or Senator ] use the
[Find Who Represents you in Congress] option on the left side. This
will provide search options. Select your State from the Drop Down
Box. Then go to the bottom of the form and select the [Submit It]
button. This site will then provide you with contact information for
your state's Senators and Representatives. If you send a letter by
US Mail it will take 3-6 weeks to reach a Senator or Representative.
But if you FAX a letter they will receive it immediately without the
security delay. Might I suggest NOT using the Email option because
your Email may Not get the attention a letter or FAX would get. I
have recently FAXed letters to all my Senators & Reps for the state
of Massachusetts where we have 2 Senators and 10 Representatives and
have already received replies by mail and phone. If you are not sure
what to write about, just click here for [Sample
Letters for HR2254 & S1939 Support] some letter examples you could use
in our petition for HR2254. Use them as they are. Make changes if
you like. And keep your letter to a single page. But most
importantly get a letter out to Petition Support for HR2254 to YOUR
States Senators & Representative NOW!
Now, you say you are from the same state as
another veteran and why should you go through the effort to also
send a similar letter to the same Senators & Representative as he
did. The answer is simple. Power in Numbers. The more veterans that
petition their Senators and Representative will bring attention to
an issue that must be considered seriously and action taken to
resolve.
You have the potential to expand our exposure
into 2-3 more states. For example, I live in Massachusetts and have
visited my congressman and he has given me his support for the
upcoming bill. And I have contacted all the other congressman from
my state. Now this is where I expanded my reach. I have a sister who
lives in Georgia, a brother who lives in Pennsylvania, and my
daughter lives in Connecticut. I have discussed my DVA issues them
and how HR2254 will solve the DVA problems. They have agreed to
write to all their congressman, just as I did, to get their support
to help me as a family member in trouble. So essentially, I have
reached out to 3 other states (about 30 Representatives), besides my
own, and made know our need for their support in the upcoming bill.
You don't have a FAX, No Problem! Print your
letter (hand written, Typed, or Laser printed) and go to your
nearest Staples, Kinko's or Office Supply Store with your list of
FAX Numbers and they can FAX them for you. They will charge about
$1.00 to fax a single page. How Easy is that? There are also some
online FAX Services that limit the amount of FAXing that can be done
daily. But, you can still use these if you FAX 1 or 2 letters a day.
By the end of the week you would have contacted all of your states
representatives.
Today is the time to take action! Tomorrow
will be to late!! So, begin today……….
Tom Laliberte
President
VASVW
|

Reprinted from the VNVETS Blog Site
Monday, May 18, 2009
Reprint from VNVETS Blog
Marcus Annaeus
Seneca wrote:
The conditions
of conquest are
always easy. We
have but to toil
awhile, endure
awhile, believe
always, and
never turn back.
HR 2254 is
finally here. It
promises to
right many
wrongs
perpetrated
against so many
Veterans by the
agency chartered
to care for
them.
Click here to
read more
Updates on
issues discussed
in past articles
Blue Water
Navy
Veterans
- Last month
we wrote
about the
Blue Water
Navy
Veterans of
Vietnam's
efforts to
obtain
benefits as
a result of
Agent Orange
contact. We
are happy to
report that
since our
last
publication,
the 81st
Texas
Legislature
has passed a
resolution
(Bill: SCR
38)
urging the
United
States
Congress to
restore the
presumption
of a service
connection
for Agent
Orange
exposure to
Navy (and
Air Force)
vets who
served on
the inland
waterways,
territorial
waters, and
in the
airspace of
Vietnam
Still Adrift...Civil Litigation
The entire June 2008 edition of this newsletter was devoted to the plight of the Vietnam Blue Water Navy and its efforts to secure compensation benefits under the Agent Orange Act. Entitled Lost at Sea, the article explained how veterans of the Blue Water navy had lost the benefit of a presumption under the Agent Orange Act that allowed veterans to recover benefits for certain diseases without specifically demonstrating that the disease was connected to Agent Orange exposure. Under an earlier interpretation of "service in Vietnam" all a veteran had to demonstrate was that he served in the operational theater of operations. In most cases the award of a Vietnam Service Medal satisfied the burden of showing service in Vietnam sufficient to invoke the presumption that certain diseases were caused by Agent Orange.
In 2001 the Veterans Administration (VA) changed the definition of service in Vietnam to require "boot on land." This new definition required showing that one had actually served in country. It immediately excluded men who served in U.S. Navy vessels offshore and made the securing of benefits difficult, if not impossible. Members of the Brown Water Navy, those who served in rivers and inland waterways, satisfied the boot on land requirement. When the June 2008 edition of Legal Alert was published, the D.C. Court of Appeals had just handed down its decision in Haas v. Peake, 525 F.3d 1168 (Fed. Cir. 2008), upholding the VA's requirement of showing actual physical presence in Vietnam. Court of Appeals decisions are normally rendered by three-member panels, and after the Haas decision, the veterans petitioned for an en banc review, requesting that the entire nine-member court review the holding. That petition was denied, and Haas appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In January 2009 the Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari refusing to hear the case and effectively killing Haas' efforts to change the law.
In July of 2008, already frustrated by their efforts to get relief in the courts, the Blue Water Navy veterans took their fight to Congress and succeeded in getting the support of Representative Bob Filner. Filner, a Republican from California, sponsored H.R. 6562, The Agent Orange Equity Act of 2008. The Act would expand the coverage of the Agent Orange Act by allowing the presumption to apply not only to those who served in country, but to Blue Water navy personnel and those who served in Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia. The determinative evidentiary factor would be the receipt of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. While the bill seemed to have some momentum in great part due to the efforts of a number of the veterans themselves, the Congressional session ended before the bill made it out of committee and to the floor of the House of Representatives. Despite the setback, Filner pledged to re-introduce the bill in 2009.
As this edition of Legal Alert goes to publication, the Blue Water navy veterans remain adrift. H.R. 6562 has not been re-introduced, although there are signs it may be in April of this year. However, the economic crisis that gripped the nation and the world in late 2008 has continued into 2009 and overshadowed virtually everything else. With judicial efforts seemingly exhausted and Congress consumed by the problems of economic stimulus and unemployment, Blue Water Navy veterans face the prospect of having their claims rejected based upon the new interpretation of service in Vietnam. Claims that had been frozen while Haas made its way through the court system are now active again, and veterans are being asked to provide whatever documentation they have to support their claims for benefits.
As frustrating as the process has become without the benefit of the presumption afforded to those who fought in country, those seeking benefits must nevertheless provide as much support as possible. The Australian/New Zealand study and report of indirect exposure through ship water distillation systems used by those countries to support paying the Agent Orange claims of their Blue Water Navy veterans needs to be used. In addition, any ship's logs, newspaper reports, and operational/combat reports that place a ship along the coast and in the realm of possible direct exposure should be provided. In a legal setting where one must prove a connection, veterans need to use the data on Agent Orange that demonstrates its toxicity and then, if possible, demonstrate that the disease for which they seek compensation does not run in their family or their community.
Those who have some access to national legislators need to make the effort to push the issue of Agent Orange Equity. These men served their country and they are rapidly running out of time. Vietnam veterans are dying and many are so from the conditions they contracted because of their service. In most cases their claims for benefits die with them. It would be a national tragedy to allow these men and their families to go uncompensated for diseases related to Agent Orange exposure.
|